《现代医学与健康研究》编辑部官网!【中国医师协会系列期刊】
气道压力释放通气模式对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的治疗效果分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R714.253

基金项目:


Analysis of the therapeutic effect of airway pressure release ventilation modes on patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 研究气道压力释放通气(APRV)和同步间歇指令通气(SIMV)+ 压力支持通气(PSV)两种机械通气模式对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者肺功能、动脉血气指标的影响。方法 选择沛县人民医院 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 10 月期间接受机械通气治疗的 40 例 ARDS 患者,按照随机数字表法分为对照组与研究组,各 20 例。对照组患者采用 SIMV+PSV 模式治疗,研究组患者采用APRV 模式治疗,均持续通气 24 h,治疗后均观察 1 个月。比较两组患者治疗后的血管外肺水指数、肺顺应性、膈肌运动幅度、平均呼吸机使用时间,治疗前后二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、血氧分压(PaO2)、氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2),观察 1 个月后的生存率、再次插管率及死亡率。结果 研究组患者治疗后的血管外肺水指数显著低于对照组,膈肌运动幅度显著大于对照组,肺顺应性显著高于对照组,平均呼吸机使用时间显著短于对照组(均P < 0.05);与治疗前比,两组患者 PaO2、PaO2/FiO2 水平治疗后均显著升高,但上述指标组间比较,以及 PaCO2 水平组内、组间比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05);研究组患者治疗后 1 个月的生存率为高于对照组;死亡率和再次插管率低于对照组,但差异均无统计学意义(均P > 0.05)。结论 ARDS 患者应用 APRV 与 SIMV+PSV 机械通气模式治疗,对患者血气指标均有改善,效果显著,但 APRV 机械通气模式治疗,可以更有效改善患者肺功能状况。

    Abstract:

    Objective To research the effects of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) + pressure support ventilation (PSV) on the indexes of pulmonary function, arterial blood gas of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods A total of 40 cases patients with ARDS who received mechanical ventilation from Peixian People's Hospital from October 2019 to October 2020 were selected and divided into the control group and the research group according to the random number table method, with 20 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with SIMV+PSV mode, and patients in the research group were treated with APRV mode.All patients were continuously ventilated for 24 h and observed for 1 month after treatment. The extravascular lung water index, lung compliance, diaphragm movement amplitude, average ventilator use time, carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2), blood oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) of patients in the two goups were compared before and after treatment; the survival rate, re-intubation rate and mortality rate 1 month after treatment of patients in the two groups were observed. Results After treatment, the extravascular lung water index of patients in the research group was significantly lower than that of the control group; the diaphragm movement range was significantly greater than that of the control group; the lung compliance was significantly higher than that of the control group; the average ventilator use time was significantly shorter than that of the control group (all P <0.05). Compared with before treatment, the PaO2, PaO2/FiO2 levels of patients in the two groups increased significantly after treatment, but there was no statistically significant difference of the above-mentioned indexes between groups and the PaCO2 levels within groups and between groups (all P >0.05). The survival rate of patients in the research group was higher than that in the control group 1 month after treatment; the mortality and reintubation rate were lower than those of the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (all P >0.05). Conclusion The application of APRV and SIMV+PSV mechanical ventilation mode treatment for ARDS patients can improve the blood gas index of the patients, and the effect is significant. However, APRV mechanical ventilation mode treatment can more effectively improve the patients'pulmonary function status.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-26
  • 出版日期:

地址:北京朝阳区北沙滩1号16信箱

邮编:100083

电话:010-64882183 64883630

E-mail:xdyx2020@vip.163.com


温馨提示:建议您使用Chrome80、火狐74+、IE11浏览器 ,当您的浏览器版本过低,可能会影响部分功能正常使用。

现代医学与健康研究 ® 2024 版权所有

技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司