《现代医学与健康研究》编辑部官网!【中国医师协会系列期刊】
容量和压力通气模式在婴幼儿喉罩麻醉中的 对比研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R614; R726

基金项目:


Comparative study of volume and pressure ventilation modes in infant laryngeal mask anesthesia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨婴幼儿喉罩麻醉中分别使用容量和压力通气模式,对患儿气道压力与血气指标水平的影响。方法 将 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 6 月茂名市妇幼保健院收治的行喉罩全麻手术的 100 例婴幼儿按照随机数字表法分为对照组(50 例,采取容量通气模式)与观察 组(50 例,采取压力通气模式)。比较两组患儿麻醉前(T0)、气腹后 10 min(T1)、气腹放气后 5 min(T2)的气道压力、潮气量、漏 气率及血气指标,以及术后 24 h 不良反应发生情况。结果 T1、T2 时,观察组患儿气道峰压(Ppeak)、平均气道压(Pmean)水平均显著 低于对照组(均P<0.05);与 T0 相比,T1、T2 时观察组患儿吸气潮气量(TV)先升高后降低,漏气率先降低后升高,而观察组 T1 时吸气 TV 水平显著高于对照组,漏气率水平显著低于对照组(均P<0.05);与 T0 相比,T1、T2 时两组患儿动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)水平 呈先升高后降低,肺泡动脉血氧分压差(A-aDO2)水平均呈逐渐升高趋势(均P<0.05);但两组患儿不同时间点动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、 PaCO2、A-aDO2 水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);观察组患儿不良反应总发生率显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 婴幼 儿喉罩全麻时应用压力通气模式和容量通气模式,均可维持良好的气道压力,而压力通气模式可进一步保证有效肺通气,降低气道压力 及喉罩漏气率,且安全性较高。

    Abstract:

    Objective? To explore the effects of volume and pressure ventilation modes on the airway pressure and blood gas index levels in infant laryngeal mask anesthesia. Methods A total of 100 infants who underwent laryngeal mask anesthesia in Maoming Maternal and Child Health Hospital from May 2020 to June 2021 were divided into the control group (50 cases, adopting volume ventilation mode) and the observation group (50 cases, adopting pressure ventilation mode) according to the random number table method. The airway pressure, tidal volume (TV), air leakage rate and blood gas indexes before anesthesia (T0), 10 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (T1), and 5 minutes after pneumoperitoneum deflation (T2), and the occurrence of adverse reactions 24 hours after operation of children were compared between the two groups. Children in both groups were observed for 24 hours after operation. Results At T1 and T2, the levels of Peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure (Pmean) of children in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P<0.05); compared with T0, the inspiratory TV of children in the observation group increased first and then decreased from T1 to T2, and the air leakage first decreased and then increased from T1 to T2, while the inspiratory TV level in the observation group at T1 was significantly higher than that in the control group, and the air leakage rate was significantly lower than that in the control group (allP<0.05); compared with T0, the levels of arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) of children in the two groups increased first and then decreased from T1 to T2, and the levels of alveolar arterial oxygen partial pressure (A-aDO2) increased gradually from T1 to T2 (all P<0.05); but there was no significant difference in the levels of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), PaCO2 and A-aDO2 between the two groups at different time points (all P>0.05); the total incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion Pressure ventilation mode and volume ventilation mode can maintain good airway pressure during infant laryngeal mask anesthesia, and pressure ventilation mode can further ensure effective lung ventilation, reduce airway pressure and laryngeal mask air leakage rate, and which has higher security. Keywords: Laryngeal mask anesthesia; Volume ventilation mode; Pressure ventilation mode; Airway pressure

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-18
  • 出版日期:

地址:北京朝阳区北沙滩1号16信箱

邮编:100083

电话:010-64882183 64883630

E-mail:xdyx2020@vip.163.com


温馨提示:建议您使用Chrome80、火狐74+、IE11浏览器 ,当您的浏览器版本过低,可能会影响部分功能正常使用。

现代医学与健康研究 ® 2024 版权所有

技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司