《现代医学与健康研究》编辑部官网!【中国医师协会系列期刊】
Tri-lock 骨保留型股骨柄与 Corail 股骨柄假体 在全髋关节置换术中的疗效评价
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R682.6

基金项目:


Efficacy evaluation of Tri-lock bone preservation stem and Corail femoral stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 对比 Tri-lock 骨保留型股骨柄(Tri-lock BPS)与 Corail 股骨柄假体在全髋关节置换术中的应用疗效,分析其对患者髋 关节功能恢复的影响。方法 回顾性分析 2017 年 7 月至 2019 年 5 月于乐山市市中区中医医院进行全髋关节置换术的 79 例患者的临床 资料,根据假体的不同分为 Tri-lock BPS 组 [33 例(33 髋),术中应用 Tri-lock BPS 假体 ] 和 Corail 组 [46 例(46 髋),术中应用 Corail 股骨柄假体 ],均于术后随访 12 个月。比较两组患者围手术期指标,术前、术后 2 周双下肢长度差,股骨小转子最宽部骨量保留面积及 大小转子间骨量保留体积,术前、术后 12 个月 Harris 功能评分,术后并发症发生情况。结果 两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后引 流量及术后并发症总发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);Tri-lock BPS 组患者股骨小转子最宽部骨量保留面积及大小转子 间骨量保留体积均显著高于 Corail 组(均P<0.05);术后 2 周两组患者双下肢长度差均显著低于术前,但组间比较,差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05);与术前比,术后 12 个月两组患者疼痛、功能、畸形、关节活动度及 Harris 功能总分均显著升高,但组间比较,差异均无统 计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 Tri-lock BPS 假体与 Corail 股骨柄假体在全髋关节置换术中均有较好的稳定性及安全性,但 Tri-lock BPS 假体有助于保留更多的骨量。

    Abstract:

    Objective To compare the application efficacy of Tri-lock bone preservation stem (Tri-lock BPS) and Corail femoral stem prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty, to analyze the effect on the recovery of hip joint function of patients. Methods The clinical data of 79 cases patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty in Chinese Medicine Hospital of Leshan City Proper from July 2017 to May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different of prosthesis, they were divided into the Tri-lock BPS group [33 cases (33 hips), using Tri-lock BPS prosthesis during the operation] and the Corail group [46 cases (46 hips), using Corail femoral stem prosthesis during the operation], all patients were follow-up for 12 months after operation. The perioperative indicators, length difference of double lower limbs before operation and 2 weeks after operation, bone mass preservation area of the broadest part in femur lesser trochanter and bone mass preservation volume between femur lesser and greater trochanter, the Harris functional score before operation and 12 months after operation, the incidence of postoperative complications of patients in the two groups were compared. Results There was no statistical significance in the difference of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and total incidence of postoperative complications of patients between the two groups (all P>0.05); the bone mass preservation area of the broadest part in femur lesser trochanter and bone mass preservation volume between femur lesser and greater trochanter in the Tri-lock BPS group were significantly higher than those in the Corail group (all P<0.05); two weeks after operation, the length difference of double lower limbs in the two groups were significantly lower than that before operation, but there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P>0.05); compared with before operation, the scores of pain, function, deformity, joint range of motion and Harris function total score of patients in the two groups 12 months after operation increased significantly, but there was no statistical significance between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion Tri-lock BPS and Corail femoral stem prosthesis have good stability and safety in total hip arthroplasty, but the Tri-lock BPS prosthesis helps preserve more bone mass.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-24
  • 出版日期:

地址:北京朝阳区北沙滩1号16信箱

邮编:100083

电话:010-64882183 64883630

E-mail:xdyx2020@vip.163.com


温馨提示:建议您使用Chrome80、火狐74+、IE11浏览器 ,当您的浏览器版本过低,可能会影响部分功能正常使用。

现代医学与健康研究 ® 2024 版权所有

技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司